Head to head
ProofFetch — Cited Web Evidence vs Scavio
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
ProofFetch — Cited Web Evidence
Cio.github.equinoxaifinance-rgb/proof-fetchNo reviews yet
Free URL preflight. Cited text via separate paid Stripe MPP API.
Full listingScavio
Aio.github.scavio-ai/scavio-mcpNo reviews yet
Structured web data from 31 platforms: Google, YouTube, Amazon, Walmart, Reddit, TikTok, LinkedIn
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Scavio (95/100 against 67). Scavio has noticeably more public adoption.
| ProofFetch — Cited Web Evidence | Scavio | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A95/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | 122 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |