Head to head
Eqvitta vs Factanker
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Eqvitta
Bio.github.Eqvitta/eqvitta-mcpNo reviews yet
Eqvitta MCP: GST billing, ledgers, invoices, stock and financial reports for Claude.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Citable US facts w/ curated query templates: SEC financials, bank call reports, nonprofits. No key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Eqvitta (83/100 against 69). Factanker is hosted and callable through the gateway; Eqvitta runs on your own machine. Eqvitta has noticeably more public adoption.
| Eqvitta | Factanker | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 281 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |