Mmcp.market

Head to head

Vibesharing vs Yaver

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Vibesharingio.github.erova/vibesharing
B
No reviews yet

Deploy prototypes and collect team feedback from Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client.

Full listing
Yaverio.github.yaver-io/yaver
C
No reviews yet

Phone-first local dev MCP for Claude Code and Codex: install Yaver, pair mobile, run, build, deploy.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Vibesharing (83/100 against 57). Yaver has noticeably more public adoption.

 VibesharingYaver
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C57/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars04
Downloads / week451.4k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools31—
Write actions13—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-172026-09-19
CategoryDeveloper toolsDeveloper tools

Other comparisons

Vibesharing vs Boat HouseVibesharing vs OmnaraVibesharing vs walkerOS FlowVibesharing vs Aiven MCPVibesharing vs ShipStaticAll Developer tools servers