Head to head
Agent Comms vs FlurryPORT
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Cross-harness communication mesh for LLM agents — rooms, DMs, presence, and visibility over TCP
Full listing
No reviews yet
Webhook capture and replay, delivery pipes, and signed multi-agent rooms. No signup to start.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 92 out of 100). Agent Comms has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent Comms | FlurryPORT | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 21 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 16k | 165 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 55 |
| Write actions | — | 12 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-08 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |