Head to head
Exploitwatch vs Deja Vu
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Exploitwatch
Capp.vercel.exploitwatch-kappa/exploitwatchNo reviews yet
Check dependencies against CISA's real Known Exploited Vulnerabilities feed.
Full listingDeja Vu
Aio.github.vshulcz/deja-vuNo reviews yet
deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Deja Vu (92/100 against 69). Exploitwatch is hosted and callable through the gateway; Deja Vu runs on your own machine. Deja Vu has noticeably more public adoption.
| Exploitwatch | Deja Vu | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 862 |
| Downloads / week | – | 941 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 1 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |