Head to head
Extend vs Doc Extract
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Turn documents into structured data: parse, extract, classify, split, and fill PDF forms.
Full listingDoc Extract
Bio.github.koraynar/doc-extract-mcpNo reviews yet
Document tooling for AI agents: PDF/text reading, chunking, schema-validated JSON output.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Extend (97/100 against 70). Extend is hosted and callable through the gateway; Doc Extract runs on your own machine.
| Extend | Doc Extract | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-28 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |