Head to head
Extend vs walkerOS Source Browser
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Turn documents into structured data: parse, extract, classify, split, and fill PDF forms.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (97 and 92 out of 100). Extend is hosted and callable through the gateway; walkerOS Source Browser runs on your own machine. walkerOS Source Browser has noticeably more public adoption.
| Extend | walkerOS Source Browser | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 344 |
| Downloads / week | – | 244 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |