Head to head
Proton Safe MCP vs Pdfintact
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read Proton Mail, extract bounded attachment text, and create explicitly confirmed drafts.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Extract tables, text and formulas from PDFs, including scanned pages and broken text layers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Proton Safe MCP (92/100 against 63). Pdfintact is hosted and callable through the gateway; Proton Safe MCP runs on your own machine. Proton Safe MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Proton Safe MCP | Pdfintact | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C63/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 13 | 3 |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |