Mmcp.market

Head to head

Feedthrough vs CloakBrowser MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Feedthroughio.github.feedthrough/feedthrough
A
No reviews yet

Debug bridge inside your web app: an agent reads the DOM, console and network. Any browser.

Full listing
CloakBrowser MCPio.github.swimmwatch/cloakbrowser-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Playwright MCP-compatible browser automation bridge for CloakBrowser Chromium.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Feedthrough (91/100 against 83). CloakBrowser MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 FeedthroughCloakBrowser MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA91/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars462
Downloads / week62428
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools16—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-042026-09-18
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Feedthrough vs Web Browser (kogiQA)Feedthrough vs SeleniumBase MCPFeedthrough vs AIHawkFeedthrough vs ScrapelessFeedthrough vs MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers