Mmcp.market

Head to head

FillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs MCPProxy

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

FillTrust security questionnaire corpuscom.filltrust/questions
C
No reviews yet

Guidance for answering vendor security questionnaires. Every result carries the page it came from.

Full listing
MCPProxyio.github.smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go
B
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (69 and 73 out of 100). FillTrust security questionnaire corpus is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCPProxy runs on your own machine. MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.

 FillTrust security questionnaire corpusMCPProxy
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC69/100B73/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–377
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools5—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

FillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs Passiv Web ToolsFillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs FallaxFillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs CrowdStrike Falcon MCP ServerFillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs SSH ManagerFillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs Reversecore MCPAll Security servers