Mmcp.market

Head to head

FillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs CodeInspectus

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

FillTrust security questionnaire corpuscom.filltrust/questions
C
No reviews yet

Guidance for answering vendor security questionnaires. Every result carries the page it came from.

Full listing
CodeInspectusio.github.Synvoya/codeinspectus
C
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours FillTrust security questionnaire corpus (69/100 against 58). FillTrust security questionnaire corpus is hosted and callable through the gateway; CodeInspectus runs on your own machine. CodeInspectus has noticeably more public adoption.

 FillTrust security questionnaire corpusCodeInspectus
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC69/100C58/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–47
Downloads / week–101
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools57
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—Apache-2.0
Last release—2026-09-07
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

FillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs Passiv Web ToolsFillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs FallaxFillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs CrowdStrike Falcon MCP ServerFillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs SSH ManagerFillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs Reversecore MCPAll Security servers