Head to head
Field Ops vs payware
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Field Ops
Cio.github.Filnith/field-opsNo reviews yet
AI agents hire a human to observe, log or film on site. Typed results, feasibility before payment.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours payware (83/100 against 57). Field Ops is hosted and callable through the gateway; payware runs on your own machine. payware has noticeably more public adoption.
| Field Ops | payware | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 62 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | 69 |
| Write actions | 1 | 21 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |