Head to head
Flowzap vs yesmcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Create workflow, sequence, architecture, and mind map diagrams via AI assistants.
Full listingNo reviews yet
See what an MCP connector can do for your business, get a scenario map, book a consultation.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Flowzap (86/100 against 60). Flowzap has noticeably more public adoption.
| Flowzap | yesmcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 5 | – |
| Downloads / week | 50 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 13 | 8 |
| Write actions | 3 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |