Head to head
MCP Virtual Computer vs Phosphor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
A persistent Docker or Fly computer with a Three.js interface and optional live Xfce desktop.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Hosts, metrics, Docker and authorized_keys over a macOS terminal's live SSH connections
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phosphor (88/100 against 80).
| MCP Virtual Computer | Phosphor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-02 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |