Head to head
Travel Assistant vs travel.art
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
No-key travel MCP for Claude Desktop, Codex-style agents, Hermes, and other clients.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Art-tourism data for AI agents: biennales, art fairs, museums, layover itineraries with 2026 facts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours travel.art (89/100 against 65). travel.art is hosted and callable through the gateway; Travel Assistant runs on your own machine. travel.art has noticeably more public adoption.
| Travel Assistant | travel.art | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 33 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |