Head to head
Runtime vs Presend MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Free MCP server: 36 security & dev API tools -- WHOIS, DNS, CVE, IP reputation, Cosmos SDK.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Presend MCP Server (79/100 against 57). Presend MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Runtime | Presend MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B79/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 37 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |