Head to head
MCP vs One Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Reliable web access for AI agents: smart HTTP, rotating proxies, and full-browser rendering.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web search, URL discovery, scraping & extraction with agent-browser and search providers
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (84 and 78 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; One Search runs on your own machine.
| MCP | One Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 142 |
| Downloads / week | 414 | 121 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-07-31 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |