Head to head
freeq vs Nomina
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and verify freeq conversations: channels, history, search, signatures, pins.
Full listing.png){kind=small}
No reviews yet
Read-only markets research for agents: ticker search, price history, date windows, comparisons.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 90 out of 100). freeq is hosted and callable through the gateway; Nomina runs on your own machine. freeq has noticeably more public adoption.
| freeq | Nomina | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 85 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |