Head to head
qikly vs IWE
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generates tests from acceptance criteria, then converges code with an agent that never sees them.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Markdown knowledge base as agent memory. Runs against the notes directory it is started in.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours IWE (94/100 against 74). IWE has noticeably more public adoption.
| qikly | IWE | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 12 | 1.7k |
| Downloads / week | 663 | 147 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |