Head to head
ssh-mcp vs Auth Token Traced Service
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
ssh-mcp
Bio.github.gelse/ssh-mcpNo reviews yet
MCP gateway for controlled SSH access with per-client auth, command policies, and audit logging.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ssh-mcp (73/100 against 62). Auth Token Traced Service is hosted and callable through the gateway; ssh-mcp runs on your own machine. ssh-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| ssh-mcp | Auth Token Traced Service | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | C62/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 8 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |