Head to head
GeoLens vs Data
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only access to a self-hosted GeoLens spatial catalog: datasets, features, maps, sandboxed SQL.
Full listing
No reviews yet
PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Server in one session. 26 read-only MCP tools for AI agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GeoLens (82/100 against 70). Data is hosted and callable through the gateway; GeoLens runs on your own machine. GeoLens has noticeably more public adoption.
| GeoLens | Data | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 248 | – |
| Downloads / week | 320 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |