Head to head
mcpm vs LLM Red-Team Scanner
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcpm
Bio.github.getmcpm/cliNo reviews yet
MCP security guard + package manager: trust-scored installs, blocks prompt injection and rug-pulls.
Full listingLLM Red-Team Scanner
Cdev.workers.manhliemcn4euwlu.llmrt-companion/llm-red-team-scannerNo reviews yet
35-probe LLM/agent security red-team scan (injection, jailbreak, MCP abuse) with report.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcpm (83/100 against 60). LLM Red-Team Scanner is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcpm runs on your own machine. mcpm has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcpm | LLM Red-Team Scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 349 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 10 | 4 |
| Write actions | 1 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |