Head to head
mcpm vs RunBoth
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcpm
Bio.github.getmcpm/cliNo reviews yet
MCP security guard + package manager: trust-scored installs, blocks prompt injection and rug-pulls.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Ask runboth.dev in plain language: what RunBoth does, how to install it, and its limits.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcpm (83/100 against 69). RunBoth is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcpm runs on your own machine. mcpm has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcpm | RunBoth | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 349 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 10 | 3 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |