Head to head
Check vs UI Verify
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Verify what an AI agent did for someone, and what commercial influence the operator disclosed.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for visual regression testing: triage a PR's UI diffs from your coding agent.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Check (91/100 against 79). UI Verify is hosted and callable through the gateway; Check runs on your own machine.
| Check | UI Verify | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B79/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 22 |
| Downloads / week | 38 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | 14 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |