Head to head
Januscope vs Grain
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local MCP proxy for tool restrictions, response redaction, audit logs, and database schema context.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Run SQL queries and inspect database schemas through safe, visible MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Januscope (92/100 against 82).
| Januscope | Grain | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 30 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 80 | 209 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-08-27 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |