Head to head
RE-call MCP Memory Server vs Neon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Agent memory on your own Postgres that flags superseded facts and abstains instead of guessing.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Neon (97/100 against 80). Neon is hosted and callable through the gateway; RE-call MCP Memory Server runs on your own machine. Neon has noticeably more public adoption.
| RE-call MCP Memory Server | Neon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 648 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |