Head to head
CRA AGENT vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Lets an agent pay for x402 APIs in USDC on Arc, under a spending policy it cannot change.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Agent-native global eSIM: buy for 193 countries, per-MB in USDT/USDC. Agents earn 20% referral.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CRA AGENT (89/100 against 78). MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; CRA AGENT runs on your own machine.
| CRA AGENT | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 80 | 456 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 12 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |