Head to head
Glasser vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
One key to 1,000+ paid data APIs: enrichment, SEO/SERP, scraping, places, news. Pay per call.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Pay-per-call AI + web + on-chain tools over x402 (USDC on Base): LLM, SEO, extract, token safety.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Glasser (93/100 against 78). Glasser is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine.
| Glasser | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 40 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-08-23 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |