Head to head
GoAI Moat AI Visibility Audit vs Geolint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
GoAI Moat AI Visibility Audit
Bcom.goaimoat/ai-visibilityNo reviews yet
Diagnose brand visibility in AI answers (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews). Free + paid audits.
Full listingGeolint
Aio.github.iliasabk/geolintNo reviews yet
ESLint for AI search: audits AI-crawler access, llms.txt, schema and citability.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Geolint (89/100 against 80). GoAI Moat AI Visibility Audit is hosted and callable through the gateway; Geolint runs on your own machine. Geolint has noticeably more public adoption.
| GoAI Moat AI Visibility Audit | Geolint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |