Head to head
Guardvibe vs MCPComp Diagnostics
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Deterministic security layer your AI can't be. 472 rules, 39 tools, CLI + doctor + host audit.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Grade an MCP server's auth against the spec and diagnose which layer a failure is in.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (58 and 60 out of 100). Guardvibe has noticeably more public adoption.
| Guardvibe | MCPComp Diagnostics | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C58/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 5 | – |
| Downloads / week | 63 | 55 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 42 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |