Head to head
Great Arrow vs Local Delegate
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared memory and actions for Claude, Kiro, OpenAI, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible AI clients.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Delegate mechanical text tasks to a local OpenAI-compatible LLM to save Claude quota.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (70 and 75 out of 100). Great Arrow is hosted and callable through the gateway; Local Delegate runs on your own machine. Local Delegate has noticeably more public adoption.
| Great Arrow | Local Delegate | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 496 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 11 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |