Head to head
RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs runx
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action
Aio.github.GSterlingPress/recoverNo reviews yet
Choose the safest next action after an API, MCP, or agent failure before retrying.
Full listing
No reviews yet
The governed runtime for agent skills. Search the catalog and inspect a skill before running it.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 88 out of 100). runx has noticeably more public adoption.
| RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action | runx | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 91 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 1 | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |
Other comparisons
RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs MCPRECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs ProjectmemRECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs Agent-Native ChatRECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs GitWarrenRECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs LockstepAll AI and agents servers