Head to head
MCP Server vs MCPComp Diagnostics
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
天启至数 ApocData - MCP Server for A-share market data (46 free, no-auth endpoints)
Full listingNo reviews yet
Grade an MCP server's auth against the spec and diagnose which layer a failure is in.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (86/100 against 60). MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | MCPComp Diagnostics | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | – |
| Downloads / week | 92 | 55 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 12 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |