Head to head
Cert Atlas vs Bluesky
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search 1,673 source-linked exam blueprints with reviewed guidance. Read-only; no API key.
Full listingBluesky
Cio.github.mrfentmen/bluesky-mcpNo reviews yet
Bluesky actor search from the public AT Protocol API. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cert Atlas (93/100 against 65). Cert Atlas is hosted and callable through the gateway; Bluesky runs on your own machine. Cert Atlas has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cert Atlas | Bluesky | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 57 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |