Head to head
HasData Google Scholar vs Video History Project
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Google Scholar search results, citation counts and citation export formats, as structured JSON.
Full listingVideo History Project
Corg.videohistoryproject/researchNo reviews yet
Search experimental video history, read public records, follow sources and export citations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HasData Google Scholar (100/100 against 69). HasData Google Scholar has noticeably more public adoption.
| HasData Google Scholar | Video History Project | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 10 | – |
| Downloads / week | 41 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |