Mmcp.market

Head to head

HexScan Token Security vs Trooth

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HexScan Token Securityxyz.hexscan/token-security
C
No reviews yet

Honeypot detection & token risk scan for ERC-20s. Risk score 0-100, tax, source verification.

Full listing
Troothio.github.trooth-eng/trooth-network
A
No reviews yet

Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trooth (85/100 against 67). Trooth has noticeably more public adoption.

 HexScan Token SecurityTrooth
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100A85/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–0
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools24
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

HexScan Token Security vs MCPProxyHexScan Token Security vs BenspdfHexScan Token Security vs DraugrHexScan Token Security vs ScanLabsAI Security ScannerHexScan Token Security vs SavingsLast retirement calculatorsAll Security servers