Head to head
Hive Intelligence MCP vs Nota
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Evidence-backed crypto due diligence with sources, freshness, and a runtime receipt on every call.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read-only crypto research skills that check a price, RSI and ATR against independent sources.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Nota (91/100 against 71). Hive Intelligence MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Hive Intelligence MCP | Nota | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B71/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 19 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 898 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | 9 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |