Head to head
Signalfuse vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
11 tools: crypto signals, sentiment, macro regime, arena, search, exec. x402 pay-per-call.
Full listingMCP Server
Cxyz.lonestaroracle/mcp-serverNo reviews yet
Paid market-data MCP: crypto, equities, smart-money, macro, wallet PnL. x402 per call on Base.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Signalfuse (80/100 against 67). MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; Signalfuse runs on your own machine. Signalfuse has noticeably more public adoption.
| Signalfuse | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 42 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 11 | 6 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |