Head to head
Signalfuse vs three.ws Agent Payments
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
11 tools: crypto signals, sentiment, macro regime, arena, search, exec. x402 pay-per-call.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Governed x402 payment sessions: pay any endpoint with budget, allowlist & per-tx caps, no key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (80 and 83 out of 100). three.ws Agent Payments has noticeably more public adoption.
| Signalfuse | three.ws Agent Payments | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 206 |
| Downloads / week | 42 | 40 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 11 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |