Mmcp.market

Head to head

Assurance vs PDF

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Assuranceio.github.i-ops-hq/assurance-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Checks what an agent did NOT read. Coverage over a retrieval step or a folder. No model.

Full listing
PDFio.github.jztan/pdf-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 85 out of 100). PDF has noticeably more public adoption.

 AssurancePDF
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA91/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0136
Downloads / week1721.2k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—13
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Assurance vs Tw Legal RagAssurance vs MiniragAssurance vs MockserverAssurance vs Agent CommsAssurance vs CHAP CoordinatorAll AI and agents servers