Head to head
IdentArk Gateway vs MCP Customs
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Zero-secret MCP gateway for AI agents: risk-scored, audited calls with human-in-the-loop approval.
Full listingMCP Customs
Cio.github.mcpcustoms/mcp-customsNo reviews yet
Inspect an MCP server for common security risks before you install it. Offline, zero telemetry.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours IdentArk Gateway (88/100 against 69). IdentArk Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Customs runs on your own machine.
| IdentArk Gateway | MCP Customs | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 28 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2026-07-31 |
| Category | Security | Security |