Head to head
UI Verify vs Stata
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for visual regression testing: triage a PR's UI diffs from your coding agent.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours UI Verify (79/100 against 66). UI Verify is hosted and callable through the gateway; Stata runs on your own machine. Stata has noticeably more public adoption.
| UI Verify | Stata | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | C66/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 22 | 260 |
| Downloads / week | – | 2.1k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 14 | — |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |