Mmcp.market

Head to head

SearXNG Search vs Liongard MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SearXNG Searchio.github.ihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxng
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading

Full listing
Liongard MCPio.github.Servosity/liongard-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Liongard config visibility: sync your estate offline, then drift-check and search it from one CLI.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SearXNG Search (83/100 against 75). SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.

 SearXNG SearchLiongard MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100B75/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars1.2k41
Downloads / week9.2k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools4—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

SearXNG Search vs Zotero MCPSearXNG Search vs Books & Papers MCP ServerSearXNG Search vs Magpie SearchSearXNG Search vs WebSearch MCP ServerSearXNG Search vs My WebsearchAll Web search servers