Head to head
Agentpack vs mFlow
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Repo-native task continuity for AI coding agents: a reviewed task-state ledger served over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agentpack (92/100 against 60). mFlow is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agentpack runs on your own machine. Agentpack has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agentpack | mFlow | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 17 | – |
| Downloads / week | 246 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |