Head to head
ImageKit DAM vs Wiki.js
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Official ImageKit media library server: search, upload, organize, tag, share and manage assets.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search, read and edit Wiki.js pages, and manage its assets, users, groups and comments
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ImageKit DAM (97/100 against 83). ImageKit DAM is hosted and callable through the gateway; Wiki.js runs on your own machine.
| ImageKit DAM | Wiki.js | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 50 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 62 |
| Write actions | — | 19 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |