Head to head
Indraft vs HubSpot MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and write a CRM built for agents. Every change carries who asserted it and how.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Every HubSpot Sales Hub feature, plus offline cross-object queries, property-change-history
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Indraft (93/100 against 75). Indraft is hosted and callable through the gateway; HubSpot MCP runs on your own machine.
| Indraft | HubSpot MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 41 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |