Head to head
Code Context vs Clinicaltrials
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local code search for AI coding agents: hybrid keyword + semantic + SQL over an index in your repo.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search and analyze ClinicalTrials.gov: trials by keyword/condition/drug/status/phase, one study's…
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 87 out of 100). Clinicaltrials is hosted and callable through the gateway; Code Context runs on your own machine. Code Context has noticeably more public adoption.
| Code Context | Clinicaltrials | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A87/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 31 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 70 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-24 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |