Mmcp.market

Head to head

Threadkeep — Agent Checkpoints vs Patchloom

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Threadkeep — Agent Checkpointsapp.vercel.interesting-concepts-ventures/threadkeep
C
No reviews yet

Agent checkpoints. Resume after context resets and handoffs with retry-safe, versioned saves.

Full listing
Patchloomio.github.patchloom/patchloom
B
No reviews yet

Agent-safe structured edits: JSON/YAML/TOML/md/AST, dry-run, batch/tx. Not a filesystem MCP.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Patchloom (75/100 against 67). Threadkeep — Agent Checkpoints is hosted and callable through the gateway; Patchloom runs on your own machine. Patchloom has noticeably more public adoption.

 Threadkeep — Agent CheckpointsPatchloom
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100B75/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–17
Downloads / week–470
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools3—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Threadkeep — Agent Checkpoints vs KLYPIX Project BrainThreadkeep — Agent Checkpoints vs Local DelegateAll AI and agents servers