Head to head
Jarroba Tools vs PostgreSQL MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Jarroba Tools
Cio.github.Invarato/jarroba-toolsNo reviews yet
104 deterministic tools for your AI: logs, tests, SQL, diagrams, SPARQL. Local, no network.
Full listingNo reviews yet
PostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL MCP Server (83/100 against 65). PostgreSQL MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Jarroba Tools | PostgreSQL MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 5 |
| Downloads / week | 672 | 4.3k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |