Mmcp.market

Head to head

HubVibe Site Audits vs First100

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HubVibe Site Auditsio.github.Its-fortunatefolly/hubvibe
A
No reviews yet

Rule-based site audits: accessibility, SEO, security headers, performance. Metered per call.

Full listing
First100io.github.jpalepu/first100
B
No reviews yet

Go-to-market tools for AI agents: publish and schedule posts, find customers, SEO, outreach.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HubVibe Site Audits (85/100 against 76).

 HubVibe Site AuditsFirst100
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100B76/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars2–
Downloads / week–210
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools5—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release2026-09-19—
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

HubVibe Site Audits vs SyteCheckHubVibe Site Audits vs SEO DataHubVibe Site Audits vs GlasserHubVibe Site Audits vs TraffalyzerHubVibe Site Audits vs AIsa On-Page AuditAll SEO servers